Present
Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseum
Deep-sea Fauna of European Seas: Bivalvia
IdentificationRemarks: For discussion about priority of name miliaris over abyssicola see in Janssen, Krylova, 2012
IdentificationRemarks: Jeffreys (1879) listed M. cuneata from stn 51 in the Mediterranean Sea. Material from this station was examined by Knudsen (1970: 66). He stated that this “should obviously be assigned to a different species”. The identity of this material remains doubtfu
IdentificationRemarks: This species has not been discussed after its description. Without examination of the type material its systematic position remains doubtful.We include it here only tentatively in Lyonsiella
IdentificationRemarks: Most records in older literature concerning the West European Basin and southwards probably do not refer to vitreum, but to otherspecies like abyssorum, ockelmanni or wareni
IdentificationRemarks: Warén (1989b: 241) suggested to synonymize the fossil B. excisa (Philippi, 1844) with the living species B. subexcisa. According to La Perna (2003: 26) excisa is different from the living deep-water species subexcisa so synonymy of the two forms is reject
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (37.9 -27.05)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (31.1 -24)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (38.9 -23.45)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (36.9 -23.1)
IdentificationRemarks: Thyasira succisa atlantica is a homonym of Thyasira (Parathyasira) atlantica Payne et Allen, 1991
Protocuspidaria (Protocuspidaria) verityi
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (50.25 -13.25)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (53.5 -13.25)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (54.7 -12.2)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (30.05 -11.7)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (47.65 -11.55)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (56.55 -11.2)
IdentificationRemarks: This species is recorded by Clarke (1962) and Oliver, Allen (1980) with a depth range exceeding 2000 m. However, for the European region there is no precise data for stations deeper than 2000 m
IdentificationRemarks: records from the abyssal North Atlantic are possibly due to misidentifications (Bouchet, Warén, 1979)
IdentificationRemarks: The identity and taxonomy of this species is unresolved, the type material is lost
IdentificationRemarks: records uncertain because of possible misidentification (see Thyasira obsoleta),see Payne, Allen, 1991: 527; “Ruth Ann”, St. 2, 7 (DiGeronimo, 1974);
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (46.5 -10.45)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (47.6 -9.73)
IdentificationRemarks: Neaera curta Jeffreys, 1876, is a nomen nudum according to Poutiers, Bernard (1995:158). However, this is not the case, because the species was characterized briefly and differentiated from N. striata Jeffreys. The name is a primary homonym of Neaera cusp
IdentificationRemarks: The date of description of this species usually is given as 1882, although it had been described prior to this in 1876. The reference of 1876 was cited erroneously by Warén, 1980 as “Neaera striata var. bicarinata” and treated as a taxon different from th
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (47.55 -9.7)
IdentificationRemarks: Thyasira(Parathyasira) atlanticais a homonym of Thyasira (Thyasira) succisa atlantica Payne et Allen, 1991 (p. 500)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (46.45 -9.6)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (47.55 -9.6)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (47.5 -9.57)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (47.5 -9.55)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (47.58 -9.55)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (47.5 -9.1)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (47.535 -9.1)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (47.55 -8.75)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (47.55 -8.65)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (47.5 -8.3)
IdentificationRemarks: Allen et al. (1995) pointed out that Leda lata Jeffreys consisted of two different taxa.They fixed L. jeffreysi Hidalgo as well as “lata” by selecting lectotypes, not taking into account that lata was renamed jeffreysi because of being a primary homonym,
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (45.125 -7.1)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (44.4 -4.85)
<http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/EPSG/0/4326> POINT (44.15 -4.25)